meta|Evidence - COVID-19
click on circles to display study description...
sarilumab (n=-9) vs. control (n=-9)
randomized controlled trial risk of bias NA
sarilumab IV 400 mg
placebo
A second cohort, which was partially recruited (n=27), compared Kevzara 800 mg versus placebo
COVID-19 severe or critically
double-blind
US
sarilumab (n=334) vs. placebo (n=86)
randomized controlled trial low risk of bias
sarilumab IV 400 mg (n=173) or 200mg (n=161)
placebo
COVID-19 severe or critically
Severe disease: requires oxygen by nasal cannula, simple face mask, or other similar oxygen delivery device. Critical disease: requires oxygen by non-rebreather mask or high-flow nasal cannula, or use of invasive or non-invasive ventilation, or treatment in an intensive care unit.
double-blind
Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Chile, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Japan, Russia and Spain
sarilumab (n=48) vs. standard of care (n=402)
randomized controlled trial high risk of bias
sarilumab (400mg)
standard care
3 arms : tocilizumab (8mg/kg), sarilumab (400mg) and control (standard care)
COVID-19 severe or critically
open-label
bayesian trial with a neurol prior (not necessary uninformative) and borrowing between the two tested treatment
sarilumab high dose (400mg) (n=173) vs. placebo (n=86)
randomized controlled trial some concerns about risk of bias
Sarilumab
Prefilled syringes (PFS) of sarilumab 200mg solution for subcutaneous injection into a specified volume of 0,9% NaCl solution for IV infusion (two syringe for the 400-mg dose). An option for a second dose existed (within the assigned treatment arm) within 24–48 hours of the first dose, based on the investigator’s benefit-risk assessment.
Placebo
0,9% NaCl solution for IV infusion.
Phase 2/3, 3 arms: Patients were randomised 2:2:1 to intravenous sarilumab 400 mg, sarilumab 200 mg, or placebo.
COVID-19 severe or critically
Patients aged 18 years or older at the time of signing informed consent who had been hospitalised for laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in any specimenwithin 2 weeks prior to randomisation and with evidence of pneumonia by chest imaging orchest auscultation and no alternative explanation for current clinical presentation. Patientsalso had to meet criteria for severe disease (defined as administration of supplemental oxygenby nasal cannula, simple face mask, or another similar device) or critical disease (defined asneed for supplemental oxygen delivered by nonrebreather mask or high-flow nasal cannula,use of invasive or noninvasive ventilation, or treatment in an intensive care unit).
Double-blind.
45 sites in Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Chile, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Japan, Spain.
1—Death; 2—Hospitalised, on invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; 3—Hospitalised, on noninvasive ventilation or high-flow oxygen devices; 4—Hospitalised, requiring supplemental oxygen; 5—Hospitalised, not requiring supplemental oxygen –requiring ongoing medical care (COVID-19 related or otherwise); 6—Hospitalised, notrequiring supplemental oxygen – no longer requiring ongoing medical care; 7—Not hospitalised.
sarilumab low dose (200mg) (n=161) vs. placebo (n=86)
randomized controlled trial some concerns about risk of bias
Sarilumab
Prefilled syringes (PFS) of sarilumab 200mg solution for subcutaneous injection into a specified volume of 0,9% NaCl solution for IV infusion (one syringe for the 200-mg dose). An option for a second dose existed (within the assigned treatment arm) within 24–48 hours of the first dose, based on the investigator’s benefit-risk assessment.
Placebo
0,9% NaCl solution for IV infusion.
Phase 2/3, 3 arms: Patients were randomised 2:2:1 to intravenous sarilumab 400 mg, sarilumab 200 mg, or placebo.
COVID-19 severe or critically
Patients aged 18 years or older at the time of signing informed consent who had been hospitalised for laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in any specimenwithin 2 weeks prior to randomisation and with evidence of pneumonia by chest imaging orchest auscultation and no alternative explanation for current clinical presentation. Patientsalso had to meet criteria for severe disease (defined as administration of supplemental oxygenby nasal cannula, simple face mask, or another similar device) or critical disease (defined asneed for supplemental oxygen delivered by nonrebreather mask or high-flow nasal cannula,use of invasive or noninvasive ventilation, or treatment in an intensive care unit).
Double-blind.
45 sites in Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Chile, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Japan, Spain.
1—Death; 2—Hospitalised, on invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; 3—Hospitalised, on noninvasive ventilation or high-flow oxygen devices; 4—Hospitalised, requiring supplemental oxygen; 5—Hospitalised, not requiring supplemental oxygen –requiring ongoing medical care (COVID-19 related or otherwise); 6—Hospitalised, notrequiring supplemental oxygen – no longer requiring ongoing medical care; 7—Not hospitalised.
powered by vis.js Network