| Outcome | Relative effect 95%CI | LoD | Trt. better when | I2 | k (RCT/OBS) | Bayesian probability | Overall ROB | Publication bias | Degree of certainty | Endpoint importance | Published MA | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| efficacy endpoints 00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| clinical improvement | 3.72 [0.11, 127.58] | > 1 | 84% | 2 studies (2/-) | 76.4 % | low | not evaluable | high | important | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Influenza-like infection | 1.54 [0.62, 3.78] | < 1 | 0% | 1 study (1/-) | 17.5 % | NA | not evaluable | important | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
            LoD: level of statistical demonstration:  Statistically conclusive: statistically significant with a strict control of overall risk of type 1 error (statistically demonstrated), does not take into account the risk of bias; 
             suggested: nominally statistically significant but without a strict control of overall risk of type 1 error; 
             inconclusive: not nominally statistically significant; 
             safety concerns; 
            
            Bayesian probability: Bayesian posterior probability of treatment effect (computed with a noninformative prior); ROB: risk of bias; k: number of studies; 
            published MA: number of published meta-analysis on the same topic; degree of certainty adapted from GRADE.  
            Trt. better when: indicates when the relative treatment effect shows that the studied treatment is better than control.