anti-inflammatoty and immuno-therapy - versus potential COVID-19 treatments - for COVID 19 hospitalized pdf   xlsx method abbreviations

Outcome Relative effect 95%CI LoD Trt. better when I2 k (RCT/OBS) Bayesian probability Overall ROB Publication bias Degree of certainty Endpoint importance Published MA

efficacy endpoints 00

death D28 0.89 [0.83, 0.95]< 138%85 studies (84/1)100.0 %moderatecritical moderatecrucial-
death or transfer to ICU 0.83 [0.65, 1.06]< 146%7 studies (5/2)92.9 %lownot evaluable highcrucial-
deaths 0.72 [0.64, 0.82]< 194%175 studies (141/34)100.0 %moderatecritical moderatecrucial1
deaths (time to event analysis only) 0.74 [0.53, 1.03]< 195%34 studies (27/7)96.2 %moderatecritical moderatecrucial-
clinical deterioration 0.75 [0.61, 0.93]< 163%32 studies (29/3)99.5 %moderatelow moderateimportant-
clinical improvement 1.21 [1.11, 1.32]> 145%40 studies (39/1)100.0 %moderatecritical moderateimportant-
clinical improvement (14-day) 1.37 [1.15, 1.64]> 140%14 studies (14/-)100.0 %some concerncritical moderateimportant-
clinical improvement (21-day) 1.50 [0.22, 10.08]> 10%1 study (1/-)66.1 %NAnot evaluable important-
clinical improvement (28-day) 1.70 [1.22, 2.38]> 152%13 studies (12/1)99.9 %moderatecritical moderateimportant-
clinical improvement (7-day) 1.46 [0.99, 2.14]> 151%8 studies (8/-)97.2 %some concernserious moderateimportant-
clinical improvement (time to event analysis only) 1.12 [1.04, 1.22]> 115%20 studies (20/-)99.8 %some concerncritical moderateimportant-
death or ventilation 0.91 [0.86, 0.96]< 152%30 studies (30/-)100.0 %some concerncritical moderateimportant-
hospital discharge 1.16 [1.05, 1.28]> 182%20 studies (17/3)99.9 %moderatecritical moderateimportant-
hospitalization 1.00 [0.14, 7.34]< 10%1 study (1/-)50.0 %NAnot evaluable important-
mechanical ventilation 0.86 [0.78, 0.94]< 126%39 studies (37/2)99.9 %moderatecritical moderateimportant1
mechanical ventilation (time to event analysis only) 0.97 [0.62, 1.52]< 10%2 studies (2/-)55.5 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
radiologic improvement (14-day) 3.49 [2.17, 5.60]> 10%5 studies (5/-)100.0 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
Recovery (time to event analysis only) 1.02 [0.81, 1.28]> 10%1 study (1/-)56.7 %NAnot evaluable important-
viral clearance 2.60 [1.42, 4.73]> 179%11 studies (11/-)99.9 %some concerncritical moderateimportant-
viral clearance (time to event analysis only) 1.60 [0.92, 2.79]> 179%4 studies (4/-)95.2 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
viral clearance by day 14 1.38 [0.20, 9.41]> 196%7 studies (7/-)62.9 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
viral clearance by day 7 1.57 [1.13, 2.18]> 158%9 studies (9/-)99.6 %some concernserious moderateimportant-
ICU admission 0.65 [0.48, 0.88]< 159%21 studies (16/5)99.7 %moderatecritical moderatenon important-
off oxygenation 1.65 [0.05, 50.02]> 181%2 studies (2/-)61.1 %highnot evaluable lownon important-
recovery 1.17 [0.98, 1.39]> 125%7 studies (7/-)96.2 %lownot evaluable highnon important-

safety endpoints 00

composite safety outcome 1.56 [0.78, 3.11]< 10%1 study (1/-)10.3 %NAnot evaluable important-
related AE (TRAE) 1.26 [0.14, 11.07]< 10%2 studies (2/-)41.9 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
related SAE (TRSAE) 2.04 [0.07, 63.93]< 10%1 study (1/-)34.4 %NAnot evaluable important-
serious adverse events 1.04 [0.90, 1.20]< 119%29 studies (29/-)28.4 %some concernlow moderateimportant-
superinfection 1.04 [0.57, 1.90]< 180%6 studies (5/1)45.3 %moderatenot evaluable moderateimportant-
acute kidney injury 0.43 [0.14, 1.34]< 10%1 study (-/1)92.7 %NAnot evaluable non important-
adverse events 1.22 [0.97, 1.53]< 144%25 studies (25/-)4.7 %some concernlow moderatenon important-
arrhythmia 0.16 [0.03, 0.90]< 10%1 study (-/1)98.1 %NAnot evaluable non important-
cardiovascular or renal events 1.87 [1.25, 2.80]< 10%1 study (-/1)0.1 %NAnot evaluable non important-
elevated liver enzymes 0.52 [0.18, 1.51]< 10%1 study (-/1)88.5 %NAnot evaluable non important-
Myocardial infarction 0.87 [0.19, 3.92]< 10%1 study (-/1)57.2 %NAnot evaluable non important-
venous thromboembolism 5.23 [0.42, 65.62]< 10%1 study (-/1)10.2 %NAnot evaluable non important-

LoD: level of statistical demonstration: Statistically conclusive: statistically significant with a strict control of overall risk of type 1 error (statistically demonstrated), does not take into account the risk of bias; suggested: nominally statistically significant but without a strict control of overall risk of type 1 error; inconclusive: not nominally statistically significant; safety concerns;
Bayesian probability: Bayesian posterior probability of treatment effect (computed with a noninformative prior); ROB: risk of bias; k: number of studies; published MA: number of published meta-analysis on the same topic; degree of certainty adapted from GRADE. Trt. better when: indicates when the relative treatment effect shows that the studied treatment is better than control.