potential COVID-19 treatments - versus standard of care - for COVID-19 severe or critically pdf   xlsx method abbreviations

Outcome Relative effect 95%CI LoD Trt. better when I2 k (RCT/OBS) Bayesian probability Overall ROB Publication bias Degree of certainty Endpoint importance Published MA

efficacy endpoints 00

death D28 0.89 [0.71, 1.11]< 114%21 studies (20/1)85.6 %moderatecritical moderatecrucial-
death or transfer to ICU 0.93 [0.87, 0.99]< 10%1 study (-/1)98.6 %NAnot evaluable crucial-
deaths 0.70 [0.51, 0.96]< 194%46 studies (41/5)98.6 %moderatecritical moderatecrucial-
deaths (time to event analysis only) 0.79 [0.42, 1.47]< 197%11 studies (10/1)77.2 %moderatecritical moderatecrucial-
clinical deterioration 0.68 [0.50, 0.92]< 10%5 studies (4/1)99.4 %moderatenot evaluable moderateimportant-
clinical improvement 1.34 [1.06, 1.69]> 168%16 studies (15/1)99.3 %moderatecritical moderateimportant-
clinical improvement (14-day) 1.18 [0.87, 1.62]> 172%9 studies (9/-)85.4 %some concernserious moderateimportant-
clinical improvement (28-day) 1.40 [0.92, 2.13]> 164%8 studies (7/1)94.3 %moderateserious moderateimportant-
clinical improvement (7-day) 1.48 [0.69, 3.16]> 151%5 studies (4/1)84.3 %moderatenot evaluable moderateimportant-
clinical improvement (time to event analysis only) 1.41 [1.13, 1.75]> 16%7 studies (7/-)99.9 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
death or ventilation 1.31 [0.69, 2.46]< 156%4 studies (4/-)20.4 %highnot evaluable lowimportant-
hospital discharge 1.17 [0.70, 1.95]> 172%5 studies (4/1)72.3 %moderatenot evaluable moderateimportant-
mechanical ventilation 0.99 [0.70, 1.39]< 10%12 studies (12/-)53.3 %some concernlow moderateimportant-
mechanical ventilation (time to event analysis only) 0.66 [0.25, 1.72]< 10%1 study (1/-)80.2 %NAnot evaluable important-
radiologic improvement (14-day) 3.53 [1.19, 10.46]> 10%2 studies (2/-)98.9 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
viral clearance 2.92 [0.16, 51.79]> 190%3 studies (2/1)76.5 %lownot evaluable highimportant-
viral clearance by day 14 7.68 [0.34, 173.70]> 190%2 studies (2/-)89.7 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
ICU admission 0.64 [0.34, 1.22]< 161%8 studies (7/1)91.1 %moderateserious moderatenon important-
off oxygenation 8.57 [1.43, 51.36]> 10%1 study (1/-)99.0 %NAnot evaluable non important-
recovery 0.64 [0.14, 2.92]> 10%1 study (1/-)28.3 %NAnot evaluable non important-

safety endpoints 00

related SAE (TRSAE) 1.24 [0.50, 3.11]< 10%1 study (1/-)32.0 %NAnot evaluable important-
serious adverse events 1.19 [0.91, 1.56]< 126%13 studies (13/-)10.6 %some concernlow moderateimportant-
superinfection 0.77 [0.06, 9.89]< 176%2 studies (2/-)57.8 %highnot evaluable lowimportant-
acute kidney injury 0.43 [0.14, 1.34]< 10%1 study (-/1)92.7 %NAnot evaluable non important-
adverse events 1.14 [0.92, 1.43]< 10%4 studies (4/-)11.7 %some concernnot evaluable moderatenon important-
arrhythmia 0.16 [0.03, 0.90]< 10%1 study (-/1)98.1 %NAnot evaluable non important-
elevated liver enzymes 0.52 [0.18, 1.51]< 10%1 study (-/1)88.5 %NAnot evaluable non important-
long QT 0.90 [0.56, 1.43]< 10%1 study (1/-)67.1 %NAnot evaluable non important-
Myocardial infarction 0.87 [0.19, 3.92]< 10%1 study (-/1)57.2 %NAnot evaluable non important-
renal impairment 1.44 [0.99, 2.11]< 10%1 study (1/-)3.0 %NAnot evaluable non important-
venous thromboembolism 5.23 [0.42, 65.62]< 10%1 study (-/1)10.2 %NAnot evaluable non important-

LoD: level of statistical demonstration: Statistically conclusive: statistically significant with a strict control of overall risk of type 1 error (statistically demonstrated), does not take into account the risk of bias; suggested: nominally statistically significant but without a strict control of overall risk of type 1 error; inconclusive: not nominally statistically significant; safety concerns;
Bayesian probability: Bayesian posterior probability of treatment effect (computed with a noninformative prior); ROB: risk of bias; k: number of studies; published MA: number of published meta-analysis on the same topic; degree of certainty adapted from GRADE. Trt. better when: indicates when the relative treatment effect shows that the studied treatment is better than control.