published meta-analysis   sensitivity analysis   studies

Vitamins in COVID 19 hospitalized - Summary of results

OutcomeTE95% CInkI2ROBPub. bias 14-days deathsdetailed resultsCOVIT-TRIAL, 2022 0.54 [0.22; 1.34] 0.54[0.22; 1.34]COVIT-TRIAL, 202210%254NAnot evaluable death D28detailed resultsCOVIT-TRIAL, 2022 0.89 [0.45; 1.75] Zhang, 2020 0.50 [0.17; 1.50] 0.76[0.43; 1.35]COVIT-TRIAL, 2022, Zhang, 202020%308seriousnot evaluable deathsdetailed resultsCao, 2020 0.15 [0.01; 3.29] COVID-VIT-D, 2022 1.48 [0.75; 2.92] COVIT-TRIAL, 2022 0.89 [0.45; 1.75] Entrenas (Pilot Calcifediol), 2020 0.12 [0.01; 2.79] Jamali Moghadam Siahkali, 2021 1.00 [0.19; 5.40] Kumari, 2020 0.60 [0.22; 1.64] Murai, 2020 1.53 [0.53; 4.43] Zhang, 2020 0.50 [0.17; 1.50] 0.92[0.62; 1.35]Cao, 2020, COVID-VIT-D, 2022, COVIT-TRIAL, 2022, Entrenas (Pilot Calcifediol), 2020, Jamali Moghadam Siahkali, 2021, Kumari, 2020, Murai, 2020, Zhang, 202087%1,415moderateserious deaths (time to event analysis only)detailed resultsZhang, 2020 0.50 [0.17; 1.50] 0.50[0.17; 1.50]Zhang, 202010%56NAnot evaluable clinical deteriorationdetailed resultsCao, 2020 0.11 [0.01; 2.21] Zhang, 2020 0.87 [0.23; 3.27] 0.49[0.08; 3.03]Cao, 2020, Zhang, 2020235%97moderatenot evaluable clinical improvementdetailed resultsCao, 2020 1.67 [0.84; 3.33] 1.67[0.84; 3.33]Cao, 202010%42NAnot evaluable clinical improvement (14-day)detailed resultsCao, 2020 2.00 [0.58; 6.94] 2.00[0.58; 6.94]Cao, 202010%41NAnot evaluable clinical improvement (21-day)detailed resultsCao, 2020 1.50 [0.22; 10.08] 1.50[0.22; 10.08]Cao, 202010%41NAnot evaluable clinical improvement (7-day)detailed resultsCao, 2020 2.38 [0.38; 14.70] 2.38[0.38; 14.70]Cao, 202010%41NAnot evaluable clinical improvement (time to event analysis only)detailed resultsCao, 2020 1.67 [0.84; 3.33] 1.67[0.84; 3.33]Cao, 202010%42NAnot evaluable hospital dischargedetailed resultsMurai, 2020 0.99 [0.71; 1.38] 0.99[0.71; 1.38]Murai, 202010%240NAnot evaluable mechanical ventilationdetailed resultsJamali Moghadam Siahkali, 2021 1.30 [0.31; 5.40] Kumari, 2020 0.76 [0.33; 1.76] Murai, 2020 0.49 [0.21; 1.14] 0.68[0.39; 1.19]Jamali Moghadam Siahkali, 2021, Kumari, 2020, Murai, 202030%447lownot evaluable radiologic improvement (14-day)detailed resultsCao, 2020 5.54 [1.01; 30.50] 5.54[1.01; 30.50]Cao, 202010%41NAnot evaluable viral clearance detailed resultsRastogi, 2020 6.33 [1.54; 26.00] 6.33[1.54; 26.00]Rastogi, 202010%40NAnot evaluable ICU admissiondetailed resultsEntrenas (Pilot Calcifediol), 2020 0.03 [0.00; 0.27] Murai, 2020 0.71 [0.37; 1.37] 0.17[0.01; 3.79]Entrenas (Pilot Calcifediol), 2020, Murai, 2020286%313moderatenot evaluable serious adverse eventsdetailed resultsCao, 2020 0.11 [0.01; 2.21] Murai, 2020 0.99 [0.02; 50.39] 0.25[0.02; 2.69]Cao, 2020, Murai, 202020%278moderatenot evaluable adverse eventsdetailed resultsCao, 2020 1.60 [0.38; 6.81] Murai, 2020 1.99 [0.07; 59.94] 1.65[0.44; 6.27]Cao, 2020, Murai, 202020%278moderatenot evaluable0.010.01.0relative treatment effectwww.metaEvidence.org2024-07-08 20:18 +02:00

TE: relative treatment effect (measured by a risk ratio, an odds ratio or an hazard ratio depending on what is reported in the papers); k: number of studies; n: total number of patients; ROB: risk of bias (ROB 2.0); Pub. bias: publication bias; OBS: observational studies; RCT: randomized clinical trials
studied treatment is better when TE > 1; studied treatment is better when TE < 1;

pathologies: 95,94,90,91 - treatments: 1244,523,885,734,1439 - roots T: 290