Study study type PathologyT1T0Patientssample sizesROB Results

es-BC - TNBC - NA - all population breast cancer - triple negative es-BC - Triple negatif (TNBC) - (neo)adjuvant (NA) es-BC - TNBC - NA - all population

versus carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel
atezolizumab plus carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel
NeoTRIPaPDLA unpublished
  NCT02620280
RCTes-BC - TNBC - NA - all populationatezolizumab plus carboplatine plus nab-paclitaxelcarboplatine plus nab-paclitaxelNeoadjuvant Therapy in TRIPle Negative Breast Cancer (early or locally advanced)88 / 86NA
inconclusive
    no statistically significant result
versus paclitaxel followed by doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide
atezolizumab based treatment
ALEXANDRA/IMpassion-030, 2024
  NCT03498716
RCTes-BC - TNBC - NA - all populationatezolizumab plus chemotherapychemotherapyPatients with newly diagnosed Stage II-III (es) primary invasive Breast cancer (BC) that is of triple negative phenotype and who were to be treated with adjuvant systemic chemotherapy following definitive surgery,1101 / 1098NA
inconclusive
  • inconclusive 11 % increase in iDFS (PE)
  • statistically significant 81 % increase in SAE (any grade)
At the final analysis, the addition of atezo to adjuvant anthracycline- and taxane-based chemo did not improve iDFS in the ITT population of stage II-III TNBC or in any of the subgroups interrogated. Safety data remain consistent with the known profile of atezo in early TNBC.
versus placebo plus SoC
atezolizumab plus nab-paclitxel followed by doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide
IMpassion-031 (all population), 2020
  NCT03197935
RCTes-BC - TNBC - NA - all populationAtezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel followed by doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide with filgrastim or pegfilgrastim supportplacebo plus nab-paclitaxel followed by doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide with filgrastim or pegfilgrastim supportneoadjuvant setting in participants with early stage (stage II-III) triple negative breast cancer165 / 168low
conclusif
  • demonstrated 95 % increase in pCR (PE)