Study study type PathologyT1T0Patientssample sizesROB Results

breast cancer - triple negative breast cancer - triple negative

versus Standard of Care (SoC)
durvalumab alone
Saphir02 Breast-Immuno, 2021
  NCT02299999
RCTbreast cancer - triple negativedurvalumabchemotherapypatients with human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (Her2)-negative metastatic breast cancer whose disease did not progress after initial chemotherapy (maintenance chemotherapy).131 / 68some concern
inconclusive
  • inconclusive 40 % increase in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
Maintenance chemotherapy was more effective than durvalumab in patients with hormone receptor-positive and Her2-negative disease.

la/mBC - TNBC - L1 - all population breast cancer - triple negative breast cancer - triple negative metastatic mBC - Triple negative (TNBC) - 1st Line (L1) la/mBC - TNBC - L1 - all population

versus placebo plus nab-paclitaxel
atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel
IMpassion-130 (all population), 2018
  NCT02425891
RCTla/mBC - TNBC - L1 - all populationatezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxelplacebo plus nab-paclitaxelpatients with untreated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) treated with nab-paclitaxel451 / 451low
conclusif
  • inconclusive 14 % decrease in deaths (OS) (PE)
  • demonstrated 20 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
  • suggested 20 % decrease in PFS (extension)
versus placebo plus paclitaxel
atezolizumab plus paclitaxel
IMpassion-131 (all population), 2020
  NCT03125902
RCTla/mBC - TNBC - L1 - all populationAtezolizumab plus paclitaxelplacebo plus paclitaxelPatients had metastatic or unresectable locally advanced measurable TNBC, had received no prior chemotherapy or targeted therapy for aTNBC and had completed any prior (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer 12 months before being randomised to the trial.431 / 220NA
inconclusive
  • inconclusive 14 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
Atezolizumab (Tecentriq) in combination with paclitaxel did not demonstrate a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) as a first-line treatment for patients with PD-L1–positive triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) / qualitative results only NO ROB
versus placebo plus SoC
pembrolizumab plus SoC
KEYNOTE-355 (all population), 2020
  NCT02819518
RCTla/mBC - TNBC - L1 - all populationPembrolizumab plus chemotherapyplacebo plus chemotherapypatients with with untreated locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (all population)566 / 281low
inconclusive
  • inconclusive 11 % decrease in deaths (OS) (PE)
  • suggested 18 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
  • statistically significant 76 % decrease in objective responses (ORR)
OS results from ESMO Congres 2021

la/mBC - TNBC - L1 - PDL1 positive breast cancer - triple negative breast cancer - triple negative metastatic mBC - Triple negative (TNBC) - 1st Line (L1) la/mBC - TNBC - L1 - PDL1 positive

versus placebo plus nab-paclitaxel
atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel
IMpassion-130 (PDL1>1%), 2018
  NCT02425891
RCTla/mBC - TNBC - L1 - PDL1 positiveatezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxelplacebo plus nab-paclitaxelpatients with untreated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer treated with nab-paclitaxel, and PDL1 positive population (>1%)185 / 184low
conclusif
  • suggested 29 % decrease in deaths (OS) (PE)
  • demonstrated 38 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
  • suggested 37 % decrease in PFS (extension)
versus placebo plus SoC
pembrolizumab plus SoC
KEYNOTE-355 (CPS>1), 2020
  NCT02819518
RCTla/mBC - TNBC - L1 - PDL1 positivePembrolizumab plus chemotherapyplacebo plus chemotherapypatients with with untreated locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (PDL1 CPS>1)425 / 211low
suggested
  • inconclusive 14 % decrease in deaths (OS) (PE)
  • suggested 25 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
OS results from ESMO Congres 2021
KEYNOTE-355 (CPS>10), 2020
  NCT02819518
RCTla/mBC - TNBC - L1 - PDL1 positivePembrolizumab plus chemotherapyplacebo plus chemotherapypatients with with untreated locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (PDL1 CPS>10)220 / 103low
conclusif
  • demonstrated 27 % decrease in deaths (OS) (PE)
  • demonstrated 34 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
OS results from ESMO Congres 2021
versus Standard of Care (SoC)
atezolizumab plus paclitaxel
IMpassion-131 (PD-L1 > 1%), 2020
  NCT03125902
RCTla/mBC - TNBC - L1 - PDL1 positiveAtezolizumab plus paclitaxelplacebo plus paclitaxelPatients had metastatic or unresectable locally advanced measurable TNBC, had received no prior chemotherapy or targeted therapy for aTNBC and had completed any prior (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer 12 months before being randomised to the trial.191 / 101NA
inconclusive
  • inconclusive 18 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)

la/mBC - TNBC - L2 - all population breast cancer - triple negative breast cancer - triple negative metastatic mBC-Triple negative (TNBC) - 2nd Line (L2) la/mBC - TNBC - L2 - all population

versus placebo plus SoC
atezolizumab plus SoC
IMpassion-132, ITT population, 2024
  NCT03371017
RCTla/mBC - TNBC - L2 - all populationatezolizumab plus SOCplacebo plus SOCPatients with locally advanced/metastatic TNBC recurring ≤12 months after completing standard (neo)adjuvant anthracycline and taxane chemotherapy or surgery in early stage297 / 298low
inconclusive
    no statistically significant result
OS was not improved by adding atezolizumab to chemotherapy for rapidly relapsing PD-L1-positive TNBC
versus Standard of Care (SoC)
pembrolizumab alone
KEYNOTE-119 (all population), 2019
  NCT02555657
RCTla/mBC - TNBC - L2 - all populationPembrolizumabchemotherapy (single agent)patients with previously treated metastatic triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC)312 / 310some concern
inconclusive
  • inconclusive 3 % decrease in deaths (OS) (PE)
  • statistically significant 60 % increase in progression or deaths (PFS)
  • statistically significant 40 % decrease in DCR

la/mBC - TNBC - L2 - PDL1 positive breast cancer - triple negative breast cancer - triple negative metastatic mBC-Triple negative (TNBC) - 2nd Line (L2) la/mBC - TNBC - L2 - PDL1 positive

versus placebo plus SoC
atezolizumab plus SoC
IMpassion-132, PD-L1 positive population, 2024
  NCT03371017
RCTla/mBC - TNBC - L2 - PDL1 positiveatezolizumab plus SOCplacebo plus SOCPatients with locally advanced/metastatic TNBC recurring ≤12 months after completing standard (neo)adjuvant anthracycline and taxane chemotherapy or surgery in early stage177 / 177low
inconclusive
  • inconclusive 7 % decrease in deaths (OS) (PE)
versus Standard of Care (SoC)
pembrolizumab alone
KEYNOTE-119 PD-L1 positive (CPS = 10 or more), 2019
 
NCT02555657
RCTla/mBC - TNBC - L2 - PDL1 positivePembrolizumabchemotherapy (single agent)patients with previously treated metastatic triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC)96 / 98some concern
inconclusive
  • inconclusive 22 % decrease in deaths (OS) (PE)
KEYNOTE-119 PD-L1 positive (CPS = 1 or more), 2019
 
NCT02555657
RCTla/mBC - TNBC - L2 - PDL1 positivePembrolizumabchemotherapy (single agent)patients with previously treated metastatic triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC)203 / 202some concern
inconclusive
  • inconclusive 14 % decrease in deaths (OS) (PE)
  • statistically significant 35 % increase in progression or deaths (PFS)
KEYNOTE-119 (PDL1 CPS>10), 2019
 
NCT02555657
RCTla/mBC - TNBC - L2 - PDL1 positivePembrolizumabchemotherapy (single agent)patients with previously treated metastatic triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC) patients with PDL1 CPS> 10 only96 / 98some concern
inconclusive
  • inconclusive 22 % decrease in deaths (OS) (PE)
KEYNOTE-119 (PDL1 CPS>1), 2019
 
NCT02555657
RCTla/mBC - TNBC - L2 - PDL1 positivePembrolizumabchemotherapy (single agent)patients with previously treated metastatic triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC) patients with PDL1 CPS> 1 only203 / 202some concern
inconclusive
  • inconclusive 14 % decrease in deaths (OS) (PE)
  • statistically significant 35 % increase in progression or deaths (PFS)

es-BC - Triple negatif (TNBC) - (neo)adjuvant (NA) breast cancer - triple negative es-BC - Triple negatif (TNBC) - (neo)adjuvant (NA)

versus non active control
avelumab alone
A-Brave, 2024
  NCT02926196
RCTes-BC - Triple negatif (TNBC) - (neo)adjuvant (NA)avelumabcontrolPatiennts at High-risk Triple Negative Breast Cancer after completion of standard treatment with curative intent including surgery and neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy.-/-NA
suggested
  • suggested 34 % decrease in deaths (OS)
  • inconclusive 18 % decrease in RFS/DFS (PE)
One year adjuvant avelumab versus control does not significantly improve DFS in high-risk TNBC patients. Nevertheless, the secondary enpoind OS was significanlty improved with avelumab vs control.
A-Brave Stratum A, 2024
  NCT02926196
RCTes-BC - Triple negatif (TNBC) - (neo)adjuvant (NA)avelumabcontrolPatiennts at High-risk Triple Negative Breast Cancer after completion of standard treatment with curative intent including surgery and neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy.-/-NA
inconclusive
  • inconclusive 19 % decrease in RFS/DFS (PE)

es-BC - TNBC - NA - all population breast cancer - triple negative es-BC - Triple negatif (TNBC) - (neo)adjuvant (NA) es-BC - TNBC - NA - all population

versus placebo
pembrolizumab alone
KEYNOTE-522, 2020
  NCT03036488
RCTes-BC - TNBC - NA - all populationpembrolizumab plus SOCplacebo plus SOCpreviously previously untreated, nonmetastatic disease, stage II or stage III, triple-negative breast cancer centrally confirmed784 / 390low
conclusif
  • demonstrated 37 % decrease in events or deaths (EFS) (extended) (PE)
  • demonstrated 12.6-fold increase in pCR (PE)
  • suggested 37 % decrease in events or deaths (EFS) (PE)
versus placebo plus SoC
atezolizumab plus SoC
IMpassion-031 (all population), 2020
  NCT03197935
RCTes-BC - TNBC - NA - all populationAtezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel followed by doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide with filgrastim or pegfilgrastim supportplacebo plus nab-paclitaxel followed by doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide with filgrastim or pegfilgrastim supportneoadjuvant setting in participants with early stage (stage II-III) triple negative breast cancer165 / 168low
conclusif
  • demonstrated 95 % increase in pCR (PE)
versus Standard of Care (SoC)
atezolizumab plus SoC
ALEXANDRA/IMpassion-030, 2024
  NCT03498716
RCTes-BC - TNBC - NA - all populationatezolizumab plus chemotherapychemotherapyPatients with newly diagnosed Stage II-III (es) primary invasive Breast cancer (BC) that is of triple negative phenotype and who were to be treated with adjuvant systemic chemotherapy following definitive surgery,1101 / 1098NA
inconclusive
  • inconclusive 11 % increase in iDFS (PE)
At the final analysis, the addition of atezo to adjuvant anthracycline- and taxane-based chemo did not improve iDFS in the ITT population of stage II-III TNBC or in any of the subgroups interrogated. Safety data remain consistent with the known profile of atezo in early TNBC.
NeoTrip Michel Angelo, 2022
  NCT02620280
RCTes-BC - TNBC - NA - all populationatezolizumab plus SOCSOCpatients with previously untreated histologically confirmed unilateral triple negative breast cancer, early high risk versus locally advanced. Pts with metastatic disease (stage IV) were excluded.138 / 142some concern
inconclusive
    no statistically significant result
The addition of atezolizumab to nab-paclitaxel and carboplatin did not significantly increase the rate of pCR in women with TNBC. In multivariate analysis, the presence of PD-L1 expression was the most significant factor influencing the rate of pCR (OR 2.08).

es-BC - TNBC - NA - PDL1 positive breast cancer - triple negative es-BC - Triple negatif (TNBC) - (neo)adjuvant (NA) es-BC - TNBC - NA - PDL1 positive

versus placebo plus SoC
atezolizumab plus nab-paclitxel followed by doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide
IMpassion-031 (PDL1>1%), 2020
  NCT03197935
RCTes-BC - TNBC - NA - PDL1 positiveAtezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel followed by doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide with filgrastim or pegfilgrastim supportplacebo plus nab-paclitaxel followed by doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide with filgrastim or pegfilgrastim supportneoadjuvant setting in participants with early stage (stage II III) triple negative breast cancer with PDL1 >1%78 / 76low
suggested
  • suggested 1.2-fold increase in pCR (PE)