Paroxetine updated on 07-01-2025

Ventricular septal defect

R analysis
id Study   Lib. in paper Exposition period    Study type  Control type 
 
Tags OR 95%CI x1/n1 x0/n0 no cases no exposed ROB Ref.
S7470
R22254
Anderson, 2020 Ventricular septal defect (VSD) – perimembranous type 1st trimester case control unexposed (general population or NOS) Adjustment: Yes Monotherapy: substance alone among all Antidep (SSRI, SNRI, ...) 1.96 [1.03;3.74] -/-   0/- - -
ref
S7350
R21489
Wemakor, 2015 Ventricular septal defect 1st trimester case control unexposed (general population or NOS) Adjustment: Yes Monotherapy: substance alone among all Antidep (SSRI, SNRI, ...) 1.90 [1.04;3.48] 18/45   6,149/23,205 6,167 45
ref
S6100
R15918
Huybrechts (Controls unexposed, NOS), 2014 Ventricular Septal Defect 1st trimester cohort unexposed (general population or NOS) excluded Adjustment: No Monotherapy: no or not specified 1.09 [0.81;1.47]
excluded (control group)
44/11,126   3,212/885,115 3,256 11,126
ref
S6101
R15922
Huybrechts (Controls unexposed, sick), 2014 Ventricular Septal Defect 1st trimester cohort unexposed, sick Adjustment: Yes Monotherapy: no or not specified Unexposed sick: old history of illness/treatment (> 12 months before pregnancy) or not specified 0.73 [0.49;1.08] 28/8,760   751/180,564 779 8,760
ref
S6017
R15552
Jimenez-Solem (Controls unexposed, NOS), 2012 Ventricular septal defects 1st trimester population based cohort retrospective unexposed (general population or NOS) excluded Adjustment: Yes Monotherapy: substance alone among the specific class of antidep (SSRI, SNRI, ...) 1.13 [0.28;4.54]
excluded (control group)
2/568   2,803/843,797 2,805 568
ref
S6022
R15620
Jimenez-Solem (Controls unexposed, sick), 2012 Ventricular septal defects 1st trimester population based cohort retrospective unexposed, sick Adjustment: No Monotherapy: substance alone among the specific class of antidep (SSRI, SNRI, ...) Unexposed sick: intermediate history of illness/treatment (3-12 months before pregnancy) 0.31 [0.07;1.45] C 2/568   9/806 11 568
ref
S6243
R16504
Malm, 2011 Ventricular septal defects 1st trimester population based cohort retrospective unexposed (general population or NOS) Adjustment: Yes Monotherapy: no or not specified 1.01 [0.54;1.88] 10/968   5,465/628,607 5,475 968
ref
Total 5 studies 1.11 [0.66;1.87] 12,432 10,341
x1: number of endpoints among exposed, n1: number of exposed; x0: number of endpoints among non exposed, n0: number of non exposed; C: calculated odds ratio from numbers of events and effectives

Forest plot

StudyTE95% CIn casesn exposedweightROBABCDEF Anderson, 2020Anderson, 2020 1.96[1.03; 3.74]--21%ROB confusion: seriousROB selection: criticalROB classification: criticalROB missing: lowROB mesure: unclearROB reporting: moderate Wemakor, 2015Wemakor, 2015 1.90[1.04; 3.48]6,1674522%ROB confusion: criticalROB selection: criticalROB classification: moderateROB missing: lowROB mesure: moderateROB reporting: moderate Huybrechts (Controls unexposed, sick), 2014Huybrechts, 2014 1 0.73[0.49; 1.08]7798,76027%ROB confusion: moderateROB selection: lowROB classification: moderateROB missing: moderateROB mesure: moderateROB reporting: moderate Jimenez-Solem (Controls unexposed, sick), 2012Jimenez-Solem, 2012 2 0.31[0.07; 1.45]115688%ROB confusion: criticalROB selection: moderateROB classification: criticalROB missing: lowROB mesure: moderateROB reporting: critical Malm, 2011Malm, 2011 1.01[0.54; 1.88]5,47596822%ROB confusion: criticalROB selection: lowROB classification: criticalROB missing: lowROB mesure: criticalROB reporting: moderate Total (5 studies) I2 = 69% 1.11[0.66; 1.87]12,43210,3410.25.01.0ROB: A: confusion, B: selection, C: classification, D: missing, E: measurement, F: reportinglow,moderate,serious,critical,unclear,

1: Controls unexposed, sick; 2: Controls unexposed, sick;

Sensitivity analysis

SubsetTE95% CIn casesn exposedkI2 Type of studies cohort studiescohort studies 0.77[0.54; 1.09]6,26510,2966%NAHuybrechts (Controls unexposed, sick), 2014 Jimenez-Solem (Controls unexposed, sick), 2012 Malm, 2011 3 case control studiescase control studies 1.93[1.24; 3.00]6,167450%NAAnderson, 2020 Wemakor, 2015 2 Type of controls unexposed (disease free or unspecified)unexposed (disease free or unspecified) 1.55[1.02; 2.37]11,6421,01327%NAAnderson, 2020 Wemakor, 2015 Malm, 2011 3 unexposed, sickunexposed, sick 0.67[0.41; 1.10]7909,3289%NAHuybrechts (Controls unexposed, sick), 2014 Jimenez-Solem (Controls unexposed, sick), 2012 2 Tags Adjustment   - No  - No 0.31[0.07; 1.45]11568 -NAJimenez-Solem (Controls unexposed, sick), 2012 1   - Yes  - Yes 1.24[0.74; 2.09]12,4219,77371%NAAnderson, 2020 Wemakor, 2015 Huybrechts (Controls unexposed, sick), 2014 Malm, 2011 4 Monotherapy   - no or not specified  - no or not specified 0.80[0.57; 1.12]6,2549,7280%NAHuybrechts (Controls unexposed, sick), 2014 Malm, 2011 2   - substance alone among all Antidep ( ...  - substance alone among all Antidep (SSRI, SNRI, ...) 1.93[1.24; 3.00]6,167450%NAAnderson, 2020 Wemakor, 2015 2   - substance alone among the specific ...  - substance alone among the specific class of antidep (SSRI, SNRI, ...) 0.31[0.07; 1.45]11568 -NAJimenez-Solem (Controls unexposed, sick), 2012 1 Unexposed sick   - intermediate history of illness/tre ...  - intermediate history of illness/treatment (3-12 months before pregnancy) 0.31[0.07; 1.45]11568 -NAJimenez-Solem (Controls unexposed, sick), 2012 1   - old history of illness/treatment (> ...  - old history of illness/treatment (> 12 months before pregnancy) or not specified 0.73[0.49; 1.08]7798,760 -NAHuybrechts (Controls unexposed, sick), 2014 1 All studiesAll studies 1.11[0.66; 1.87]12,43210,34169%NAAnderson, 2020 Wemakor, 2015 Huybrechts (Controls unexposed, sick), 2014 Jimenez-Solem (Controls unexposed, sick), 2012 Malm, 2011 50.15.01.0

Publication bias and p-hacking diagnosis

funnel plot
0.0-1.81.90.9400.000Anderson, 2020Wemakor, 2015Huybrechts (Controls unexposed, sick), 2014Jimenez-Solem (Controls unexposed, sick), 2012Malm, 2011

Asymetry test p-value = 0.9314 (by Egger's regression)

slope=-0.0080 (0.7951); intercept=0.2484 (2.6579); t=0.0935; p=0.9314

p values plot
0.01.00.01.0

Sub-groups analysis using all included studies

excluded 6017, 6100

Sub-groupsTE95% CIn casesn exposedkI2ROB type of controls unexposed controls (disease free or unspecified)unexposed controls (disease free or unspecified) 1.30[0.98; 1.73]17,70312,70720%NAAnderson, 2020 Wemakor, 2015 Huybrechts (Controls unexposed, NOS), 2014 Jimenez-Solem (Controls unexposed, NOS), 2012 Malm, 2011 5 unexposed, sick controlsunexposed, sick controls 0.67[0.41; 1.10]7909,3289%NAHuybrechts (Controls unexposed, sick), 2014 Jimenez-Solem (Controls unexposed, sick), 2012 20.510.01.0

Umbrella review (other published meta-analyses)

Published MAControlPeriodTE95% CIn exposedkI2 Bérard (Ventricular septal defect)Bérard (Ventricular septal defect) 1.26[0.69; 2.32]59.1%-Wwhatever (meta-analysis)T11st trimesterstudies TTT5 metaPregmetaPreg 1.11[0.66; 1.87]69%10,341----Anderson, 2020 Wemakor, 2015 Huybrechts (Controls unexposed, sick), 2014 Jimenez-Solem (Controls unexposed, sick), 2012 Malm, 2011 50.510.01.0