Ondansetron

Anotia

R analysis
id Study   Lib. in paper Exposition period    Study type 
 Control type 
 
Tags OR 95%CI x1/n1 x0/n0 no cases no exposed ROB Ref.
S2756
R3687		 Parker, NBDPS study, 2018 Anotia, microtia 1st trimester case control unexposed, sick Adjustment: Yes 1.10 [0.60;2.10] 10/263   344/6,842 354 263
ref
Total 1 studies 1.10 [0.59;2.06] 354 263
x1: number of endpoints among exposed, n1: number of exposed; x0: number of endpoints among non exposed, n0: number of non exposed; C: calculated odds ratio from numbers of events and effectives

Forest plot

StudyTE95% CIn casesn exposedweightROBABCDEF Parker, NBDPS study, 2018Parker, NBDPS study, 2018 1.10[0.60; 2.10]3542630%ROB confusion: NAROB selection: NAROB classification: NAROB missing: NAROB mesure: NAROB reporting: NA0.55.01.0ROB: A: confusion, B: selection, C: classification, D: missing, E: measurement, F: reportinglow,moderate,serious,critical,unclear,

Sensitivity analysis

SubsetTE95% CIn casesn exposedkI2 Type of studies cohort studiescohort studies 0 case control studiescase control studies 1.10[0.59; 2.06]354263 -NAParker, NBDPS study, 2018 1 Type of controls unexposed, sickunexposed, sick 1.10[0.59; 2.06]354263 -NAParker, NBDPS study, 2018 1 Tags Adjustment   - Yes  - Yes 1.10[0.59; 2.06]354263 -NAParker, NBDPS study, 2018 1 All studiesAll studies 1.10[0.59; 2.06]354263 -NAParker, NBDPS study, 2018 10.55.01.0

Publication bias and p-hacking diagnosis

funnel plot

Funnel plot not drawn. Less than 3 points.

Asymetry test p-value = NaN (by Egger's regression)

not enought points

p values plot

Funnel plot not drawn. Less than 3 points.

Sub-groups analysis using all included studies

excluded

Sub-groupsTE95% CIn casesn exposedkI2ROB type of controls unexposed, sick controlsunexposed, sick controls 1.10[0.59; 2.06]354263 -NAParker, NBDPS study, 2018 10.510.01.0