Sumatriptan

Congenital heart defects

R analysis
id Study   Lib. in paper Exposition period    Study type 
 Control type 
 
Tags OR 95%CI x1/n1 x0/n0 no cases no exposed ROB Ref.
S3548
R7044		 De Jonge, 2013 Heart defects 1st trimester case control unexposed (general population or NOS) Adjustment: No 2.31 [0.84;6.39] C 4/62   869/30,034 873 62
ref
Total 1 studies 2.31 [0.84;6.39] 873 62
x1: number of endpoints among exposed, n1: number of exposed; x0: number of endpoints among non exposed, n0: number of non exposed; C: calculated odds ratio from numbers of events and effectives

Forest plot

StudyTE95% CIn casesn exposedweightROBABCDEF De Jonge, 2013De Jonge, 2013 2.31[0.84; 6.39]873620%ROB confusion: criticalROB selection: criticalROB classification: criticalROB missing: lowROB mesure: moderateROB reporting: moderate0.95.01.0ROB: A: confusion, B: selection, C: classification, D: missing, E: measurement, F: reportinglow,moderate,serious,critical,unclear,

Sensitivity analysis

SubsetTE95% CIn casesn exposedkI2 Type of studies cohort studiescohort studies 0 case control studiescase control studies 2.31[0.84; 6.39]87362 -NADe Jonge, 2013 1 Type of controls unexposed (disease free or unspecified)unexposed (disease free or unspecified) 2.31[0.84; 6.39]87362 -NADe Jonge, 2013 1 Tags Adjustment   - No  - No 2.31[0.84; 6.39]87362 -NADe Jonge, 2013 1 All studiesAll studies 2.31[0.84; 6.39]87362 -NADe Jonge, 2013 10.55.01.0

Publication bias and p-hacking diagnosis

funnel plot

Funnel plot not drawn. Less than 3 points.

Asymetry test p-value = NaN (by Egger's regression)

not enought points

p values plot

Funnel plot not drawn. Less than 3 points.

Sub-groups analysis using all included studies

excluded

Sub-groupsTE95% CIn casesn exposedkI2ROB type of controls unexposed controls (disease free or unspecified)unexposed controls (disease free or unspecified) 2.31[0.84; 6.39]87362 -NADe Jonge, 2013 10.510.01.0