Calcium channel blockers (versus unexposed)

All congenital malformations (majors, minors, majors and minors, or unspecified)

R analysis
id Study   Lib. in paper Exposition period    Study type  Control type 
 
Tags OR 95%CI x1/n1 x0/n0 no cases no exposed ROB Ref.
S14091
R56263
Ishikawa - Amlodipine (Controls unexposed, disease free), 2023 Major congenital malformations 1st trimester retrospective cohort (claims database) unexposed, disease free excluded Adjustment: No Indications Antihypertensive: Only chronic hypertension indication 1.98 [0.78;5.02] C
excluded (control group)
5/44   4,519/74,213 4,524 44
ref
S14090
R56264
Ishikawa - Amlodipine (Controls unexposed, sick), 2023 Major congenital malformations 1st trimester retrospective cohort (claims database) unexposed, sick Adjustment: No Indications Antihypertensive: Only chronic hypertension indication 1.69 [0.65;4.42] C 5/44   71/1,007 76 44
ref
S13387
R56273
Mito - Amlodipine, 2019 Major anomalies _ morphologic abnormalities at least 1st trimester retrospective cohort unexposed, sick Adjustment: No Indications Antihypertensive: Only chronic hypertension indication 0.89 [0.17;4.57] 2/48   6/129 8 48
ref
S13805
R56295
Van Gelder - Calcium blockers, 2015 Selected major birth defects (heart defects, CNS malformations, cleft lip with or without cleft palate, small intestinal atresia/stenosis, hypospadias, ...) 1st trimester case control unexposed (general population or NOS) Adjustment: No Indications Antihypertensive: All hypertensions, any indications or not specified 1.20 [0.60;2.50] 14/29   5,554/12,792 5,568 29
ref
S13937
R56300
Vasilakis-Scaramozza - Calcium blockers, 2013 Any anomaly, excluding minor and chromosomal anomalies 1st trimester retrospective cohort unexposed (general population or NOS) Adjustment: Yes Indications Antihypertensive: All hypertensions, any indications or not specified 0.60 [0.10;4.80] 1/55   16/682 17 55
ref
S13469
R56279
Nakhai-Pour - Calcium blockers, 2010 Major malformations 1st trimester nested case control unexposed (general population or NOS) Adjustment: No Indications Antihypertensive: All hypertensions, any indications or not specified 3.30 [0.70;15.56] C 2/10   4,153/59,023 4,155 10
ref
S13987
R54925
Weber-Schoendorfer - Calcium blockers, 2008 All birth defects at least 1st trimester prospective cohort unexposed (general population or NOS) Adjustment: Yes Indications Antihypertensive: All hypertensions, any indications or not specified 1.58 [0.81;3.07] 15/229   33/724 48 229
ref
S13996
R56303
Sorensen - Calcium blockers, 2001 All congenital abnormality 1st trimester case control unexposed (general population or NOS) Adjustment: Yes Indications Antihypertensive: All hypertensions, any indications or not specified 1.40 [0.90;2.20] 40/89   22,825/60,927 22,865 89
ref
S13969
R54759
Parazzini - Nifedipine, 1998 Congenital malformations 2nd and/or 3rd trimester excluded randomized controlled trial unexposed, sick Adjustment: Randomisation Indications Antihypertensive: All hypertensions, any indications or not specified 1.98 [0.18;22.16] C
excluded (exposition period)
2/129   1/127 3 129
ref
S13988
R56270
Magee - Calcium blockers, 1996 Birth defects (major malformations) at least 1st trimester prospective cohort unexposed (general population or NOS) Adjustment: No Indications Antihypertensive: All hypertensions, any indications or not specified Matched 5.63 [0.27;119.49] C 2/66   0/72 2 66
ref
Total 8 studies 1.44 [1.07;1.93] 32,739 570
x1: number of endpoints among exposed, n1: number of exposed; x0: number of endpoints among non exposed, n0: number of non exposed; C: calculated odds ratio from numbers of events and effectives

Forest plot

StudyTE95% CIn casesn exposedweightROBABCDEF Ishikawa - Amlodipine (Controls unexposed, sick), 2023Ishikawa - Amlodipine, 2023 1 1.69[0.65; 4.42]76449%ROB confusion: criticalROB selection: criticalROB classification: criticalROB missing: unclearROB mesure: moderateROB reporting: moderate Mito - Amlodipine, 2019Mito - Amlodipine, 2019 0.89[0.17; 4.57]8483%ROB confusion: seriousROB selection: criticalROB classification: criticalROB missing: unclearROB mesure: criticalROB reporting: moderate Van Gelder - Calcium blockers, 2015Van Gelder - Calcium blockers, 2015 1.20[0.60; 2.50]5,5682917%ROB confusion: criticalROB selection: criticalROB classification: criticalROB missing: lowROB mesure: criticalROB reporting: moderate Vasilakis-Scaramozza - Calcium blockers, 2013Vasilakis-Scaramozza - Calcium blockers, 2013 0.60[0.10; 4.80]17552%ROB confusion: seriousROB selection: moderateROB classification: criticalROB missing: unclearROB mesure: moderateROB reporting: moderate Nakhai-Pour - Calcium blockers, 2010Nakhai-Pour - Calcium blockers, 2010 3.30[0.70; 15.56]4,155104%ROB confusion: criticalROB selection: moderateROB classification: criticalROB missing: unclearROB mesure: moderateROB reporting: moderate Weber-Schoendorfer - Calcium blockers, 2008Weber-Schoendorfer - Calcium blockers, 2008 1.58[0.81; 3.07]4822920%ROB confusion: seriousROB selection: moderateROB classification: moderateROB missing: moderateROB mesure: unclearROB reporting: moderate Sorensen - Calcium blockers, 2001Sorensen - Calcium blockers, 2001 1.40[0.90; 2.20]22,8658944%ROB confusion: criticalROB selection: criticalROB classification: moderateROB missing: lowROB mesure: unclearROB reporting: moderate Magee - Calcium blockers, 1996Magee - Calcium blockers, 1996 5.63[0.27; 119.49]2661%ROB confusion: criticalROB selection: criticalROB classification: moderateROB missing: moderateROB mesure: criticalROB reporting: moderate Total (8 studies) I2 = 0% 1.44[1.07; 1.93]32,7395700.220.01.0ROB: A: confusion, B: selection, C: classification, D: missing, E: measurement, F: reportinglow,moderate,serious,critical,unclear,

1: Controls unexposed, sick;

Sensitivity analysis

SubsetTE95% CIn casesn exposedkI2 Type of studies cohort studiescohort studies 1.48[0.90; 2.43]1514420%NAIshikawa - Amlodipine (Controls unexposed, sick), 2023 Mito - Amlodipine, 2019 Vasilakis-Scaramozza - Calcium blockers, 2013 Weber-Schoendorfer - Calcium blockers, 2008 Magee - Calcium blockers, 1996 5 case control studiescase control studies 1.41[0.98; 2.04]32,5881280%NAVan Gelder - Calcium blockers, 2015 Nakhai-Pour - Calcium blockers, 2010 Sorensen - Calcium blockers, 2001 3 Type of controls unexposed (disease free or unspecified)unexposed (disease free or unspecified) 1.44[1.05; 1.97]32,6554780%NAVan Gelder - Calcium blockers, 2015 Vasilakis-Scaramozza - Calcium blockers, 2013 Nakhai-Pour - Calcium blockers, 2010 Weber-Schoendorfer - Calcium blockers, 2008 Sorensen - Calcium blockers, 2001 Magee - Calcium blockers, 1996 6 unexposed, sickunexposed, sick 1.43[0.63; 3.28]84920%NAIshikawa - Amlodipine (Controls unexposed, sick), 2023 Mito - Amlodipine, 2019 2 Tags Adjustment   - No  - No 1.49[0.90; 2.46]9,8091970%NAIshikawa - Amlodipine (Controls unexposed, sick), 2023 Mito - Amlodipine, 2019 Van Gelder - Calcium blockers, 2015 Nakhai-Pour - Calcium blockers, 2010 Magee - Calcium blockers, 1996 5   - Yes  - Yes 1.41[0.98; 2.03]22,9303730%NAVasilakis-Scaramozza - Calcium blockers, 2013 Weber-Schoendorfer - Calcium blockers, 2008 Sorensen - Calcium blockers, 2001 3 Indications Antihypertensive   - All hypertensions, any indications ...  - All hypertensions, any indications or not specified 1.44[1.05; 1.97]32,6554780%NAVan Gelder - Calcium blockers, 2015 Vasilakis-Scaramozza - Calcium blockers, 2013 Nakhai-Pour - Calcium blockers, 2010 Weber-Schoendorfer - Calcium blockers, 2008 Sorensen - Calcium blockers, 2001 Magee - Calcium blockers, 1996 6   - Only chronic hypertension indication  - Only chronic hypertension indication 1.43[0.63; 3.28]84920%NAIshikawa - Amlodipine (Controls unexposed, sick), 2023 Mito - Amlodipine, 2019 2 MatchedMatched 5.63[0.27; 119.49]266 -NAMagee - Calcium blockers, 1996 1 All studiesAll studies 1.44[1.07; 1.93]32,7395700%NAIshikawa - Amlodipine (Controls unexposed, sick), 2023 Mito - Amlodipine, 2019 Van Gelder - Calcium blockers, 2015 Vasilakis-Scaramozza - Calcium blockers, 2013 Nakhai-Pour - Calcium blockers, 2010 Weber-Schoendorfer - Calcium blockers, 2008 Sorensen - Calcium blockers, 2001 Magee - Calcium blockers, 1996 80.220.01.0

Publication bias and p-hacking diagnosis

funnel plot
0.0-3.74.01.8710.000Ishikawa - Amlodipine (Controls unexposed, sick), 2023Mito - Amlodipine, 2019Van Gelder - Calcium blockers, 2015Vasilakis-Scaramozza - Calcium blockers, 2013Nakhai-Pour - Calcium blockers, 2010Weber-Schoendorfer - Calcium blockers, 2008Sorensen - Calcium blockers, 2001Magee - Calcium blockers, 1996

Asymetry test p-value = 0.6583 (by Egger's regression)

slope=0.2717 (0.2227); intercept=0.2430 (0.5227); t=0.4650; p=0.6583

p values plot
0.01.00.01.0

Sub-groups analysis using all included studies

excluded 14091

Sub-groupsTE95% CIn casesn exposedkI2ROB type of controls unexposed controls (disease free or unspecified)unexposed controls (disease free or unspecified) 1.48[1.10; 2.00]37,1795220%NAIshikawa - Amlodipine (Controls unexposed, disease free), 2023 Van Gelder - Calcium blockers, 2015 Vasilakis-Scaramozza - Calcium blockers, 2013 Nakhai-Pour - Calcium blockers, 2010 Weber-Schoendorfer - Calcium blockers, 2008 Sorensen - Calcium blockers, 2001 Magee - Calcium blockers, 1996 7 unexposed, sick controlsunexposed, sick controls 1.43[0.63; 3.28]84920%NAIshikawa - Amlodipine (Controls unexposed, sick), 2023 Mito - Amlodipine, 2019 20.510.01.0