Terconazole updated on 01-29-2025

Diaphragmatic hernia

R analysis
id Study   Lib. in paper Exposition period    Study type 
 Control type 
 
Tags OR 95%CI x1/n1 x0/n0 no cases no exposed ROB Ref.
S10625
R39276		 Carter, 2008 Diaphragmatic hernia 1st trimester case control unexposed (general population or NOS) Adjustment: No 1.34 [0.08;23.78] C 0/6   275/5,043 275 6
ref
Total 1 studies 1.34 [0.08;23.78] 275 6
x1: number of endpoints among exposed, n1: number of exposed; x0: number of endpoints among non exposed, n0: number of non exposed; C: calculated odds ratio from numbers of events and effectives

Forest plot

StudyTE95% CIn casesn exposedweightROBABCDEF Carter, 2008Carter, 2008 1.34[0.08; 23.78]27560%ROB confusion: criticalROB selection: criticalROB classification: criticalROB missing: moderateROB mesure: moderateROB reporting: moderate0.55.01.0ROB: A: confusion, B: selection, C: classification, D: missing, E: measurement, F: reportinglow,moderate,serious,critical,unclear,

Sensitivity analysis

SubsetTE95% CIn casesn exposedkI2 Type of studies cohort studiescohort studies 0 case control studiescase control studies 1.34[0.08; 23.78]2756 -NACarter, 2008 1 Type of controls unexposed (disease free or unspecified)unexposed (disease free or unspecified) 1.34[0.08; 23.78]2756 -NACarter, 2008 1 Tags Adjustment   - No  - No 1.34[0.08; 23.78]2756 -NACarter, 2008 1 All studiesAll studies 1.34[0.08; 23.78]2756 -NACarter, 2008 10.55.01.0

Publication bias and p-hacking diagnosis

funnel plot

Funnel plot not drawn. Less than 3 points.

Asymetry test p-value = NaN (by Egger's regression)

not enought points

p values plot

Funnel plot not drawn. Less than 3 points.

Sub-groups analysis using all included studies

excluded

Sub-groupsTE95% CIn casesn exposedkI2ROB type of controls unexposed controls (disease free or unspecified)unexposed controls (disease free or unspecified) 1.34[0.08; 23.78]2756 -NACarter, 2008 10.510.01.0