Rabeprazole

Congenital heart defects

R analysis
id Study   Lib. in paper Exposition period    Study type 
 Control type 
 
Tags OR 95%CI x1/n1 x0/n0 no cases no exposed ROB Ref.
S14454
R57371		 Choi a, 2023 Congenital heart defects 1st trimester retrospective cohort (claims database) unexposed, sick Adjustment: Yes 1.05 [0.93;1.19] 265/13,414   42,154/2,655,676 42,419 13,414
ref
Total 1 studies 1.05 [0.93;1.19] 42,419 13,414
x1: number of endpoints among exposed, n1: number of exposed; x0: number of endpoints among non exposed, n0: number of non exposed; C: calculated odds ratio from numbers of events and effectives

Forest plot

StudyTE95% CIn casesn exposedweightROBABCDEF Choi a, 2023Choi a, 2023 1.05[0.93; 1.19]42,41913,4140%ROB confusion: moderateROB selection: lowROB classification: moderateROB missing: unclearROB mesure: NAROB reporting: NA0.55.01.0ROB: A: confusion, B: selection, C: classification, D: missing, E: measurement, F: reportinglow,moderate,serious,critical,unclear,

Sensitivity analysis

SubsetTE95% CIn casesn exposedkI2 Type of studies cohort studiescohort studies 1.05[0.93; 1.19]42,41913,414 -NAChoi a, 2023 1 case control studiescase control studies 0 Type of controls unexposed, sickunexposed, sick 1.05[0.93; 1.19]42,41913,414 -NAChoi a, 2023 1 Tags Adjustment   - Yes  - Yes 1.05[0.93; 1.19]42,41913,414 -NAChoi a, 2023 1 All studiesAll studies 1.05[0.93; 1.19]42,41913,414 -NAChoi a, 2023 10.55.01.0

Publication bias and p-hacking diagnosis

funnel plot

Funnel plot not drawn. Less than 3 points.

Asymetry test p-value = NaN (by Egger's regression)

not enought points

p values plot

Funnel plot not drawn. Less than 3 points.

Sub-groups analysis using all included studies

excluded

Sub-groupsTE95% CIn casesn exposedkI2ROB type of controls unexposed, sick controlsunexposed, sick controls 1.05[0.93; 1.19]42,41913,414 -NAChoi a, 2023 10.510.01.0