Carbamazepine (Epilepsy) updated on 04-22-2025

Hypospadias

R analysis
id Study   Lib. in paper Exposition period    Study type  Control type 
 
Tags OR 95%CI x1/n1 x0/n0 no cases no exposed ROB Ref.
S382
R16394
Tomson (Carbamazepine), 2018 Hypospadias at least 1st trimester prospective cohort exposed to other treatment, sick Adjustment: No 2.15 [0.78;5.92] C 10/1,957   6/2,514 16 1,957
ref
S6290
R16960
Campbell (Carbamazepine) (Controls exposed to Lamotrigine, sick), 2014 Hypospadias and genitourinary tract defects 1st trimester prospective cohort exposed to other treatment, sick Adjustment: No 0.63 [0.22;1.85] C 5/1,657   10/2,098 15 1,657
ref
S5937
R23778
Hernández-Díaz (Carbamazepine), 2012 Hypospadias 1st trimester prospective cohort exposed to other treatment, sick Adjustment: No Controls: mixed indications 4.54 [0.18;111.60] C 1/1,033   0/1,562 1 1,033
ref
S5483
R15647
Bànhidy (Carbamazepine), 2011 Hypospadias throughout pregnancy case control unexposed, sick Adjustment: No Matched 0.33 [0.03;3.78] C 1/11   3/13 4 11
ref
S8411
R26712
Jentink (Carbamazepine), 2010 Hypospadias 1st trimester case control unexposed (general population or NOS) Adjustment: Yes 0.70 [0.30;1.60] 6/-   -/- - -
ref
S6685
R18587
D'Souza (Carbamazepine) (Controls unexposed, disease free), 1991 Hypospadias throughout pregnancy prospective cohort unexposed, disease free excluded Adjustment: No Matched 24.60 [0.40;1512.72] C
excluded (control group)
0/3   0/62 0 3
ref
S6689
R18704
D'Souza (Carbamazepine) (Controls unexposed, sick), 1991 Hypospadias throughout pregnancy prospective cohort unexposed, sick Adjustment: No 3.00 [0.05;194.76] C 0/3   0/8 0 3
ref
S6823
R19301
Van der Pol (Carbamazepine) (Controls unexposed, disease free), 1991 Hypospadias throughout pregnancy prospective cohort unexposed, disease free excluded Adjustment: No Matched 5.19 [0.10;276.47] C
excluded (control group)
0/11   0/55 0 11
ref
S6825
R19351
Van der Pol (Carbamazepine) (Controls unexposed, sick), 1991 Hypospadias throughout pregnancy prospective cohort unexposed, sick Adjustment: No 2.05 [0.04;110.56] C 0/11   0/22 0 11
ref
Total 7 studies 0.97 [0.58;1.64] 36 4,672
x1: number of endpoints among exposed, n1: number of exposed; x0: number of endpoints among non exposed, n0: number of non exposed; C: calculated odds ratio from numbers of events and effectives

Forest plot

StudyTE95% CIn casesn exposedweightROBABCDEF Tomson (Carbamazepine), 2018Tomson, 2018 1 2.15[0.78; 5.92]161,95727%ROB confusion: NAROB selection: NAROB classification: NAROB missing: NAROB mesure: NAROB reporting: NA Campbell (Carbamazepine) (Controls exposed to Lamotrigine, sick), 2014Campbell, 2014 2 0.63[0.22; 1.85]151,65724%ROB confusion: criticalROB selection: lowROB classification: moderateROB missing: unclearROB mesure: moderateROB reporting: moderate Hernández-Díaz (Carbamazepine), 2012Hernández-Díaz, 2012 3 4.54[0.18; 111.60]11,0333%ROB confusion: criticalROB selection: moderateROB classification: moderateROB missing: moderateROB mesure: moderateROB reporting: moderate Bànhidy (Carbamazepine), 2011Bànhidy, 2011 4 0.33[0.03; 3.78]4115%ROB confusion: criticalROB selection: criticalROB classification: lowROB missing: lowROB mesure: moderateROB reporting: moderate Jentink (Carbamazepine), 2010Jentink, 2010 5 0.70[0.30; 1.60]--39%ROB confusion: NAROB selection: NAROB classification: NAROB missing: NAROB mesure: NAROB reporting: NA D'Souza (Carbamazepine) (Controls unexposed, sick), 1991D'Souza, 1991 6 3.00[0.05; 194.76]032%ROB confusion: NAROB selection: NAROB classification: NAROB missing: NAROB mesure: NAROB reporting: NA Van der Pol (Carbamazepine) (Controls unexposed, sick), 1991Van der Pol, 1991 7 2.05[0.04; 110.56]0112%ROB confusion: criticalROB selection: moderateROB classification: moderateROB missing: lowROB mesure: moderateROB reporting: moderate Total (7 studies) I2 = 0% 0.97[0.58; 1.64]364,6720.210.01.0ROB: A: confusion, B: selection, C: classification, D: missing, E: measurement, F: reportinglow,moderate,serious,critical,unclear,

1: Carbamazepine; 2: Carbamazepine) (Controls exposed to Lamotrigine, sick; 3: Carbamazepine; 4: Carbamazepine; 5: Carbamazepine; 6: Carbamazepine) (Controls unexposed, sick; 7: Carbamazepine) (Controls unexposed, sick;

Sensitivity analysis

SubsetTE95% CIn casesn exposedkI2 Type of studies cohort studiescohort studies 1.34[0.67; 2.69]324,6610%NATomson (Carbamazepine), 2018 Campbell (Carbamazepine) (Controls exposed to Lamotrigine, sick), 2014 Hernández-Díaz (Carbamazepine), 2012 D'Souza (Carbamazepine) (Controls unexposed, sick), 1991 Van der Pol (Carbamazepine) (Controls unexposed, sick), 1991 5 case control studiescase control studies 0.65[0.29; 1.43]4110%NABànhidy (Carbamazepine), 2011 Jentink (Carbamazepine), 2010 2 Type of controls unexposed (disease free or unspecified)unexposed (disease free or unspecified) 0.70[0.30; 1.62]-- -NAJentink (Carbamazepine), 2010 1 unexposed, sickunexposed, sick 0.76[0.12; 4.89]4250%NABànhidy (Carbamazepine), 2011 D'Souza (Carbamazepine) (Controls unexposed, sick), 1991 Van der Pol (Carbamazepine) (Controls unexposed, sick), 1991 3 exposed to other treatment, sickexposed to other treatment, sick 1.34[0.48; 3.71]324,64739%NATomson (Carbamazepine), 2018 Campbell (Carbamazepine) (Controls exposed to Lamotrigine, sick), 2014 Hernández-Díaz (Carbamazepine), 2012 3 Tags Adjustment   - No  - No 1.21[0.62; 2.36]364,6720%NATomson (Carbamazepine), 2018 Campbell (Carbamazepine) (Controls exposed to Lamotrigine, sick), 2014 Hernández-Díaz (Carbamazepine), 2012 Bànhidy (Carbamazepine), 2011 D'Souza (Carbamazepine) (Controls unexposed, sick), 1991 Van der Pol (Carbamazepine) (Controls unexposed, sick), 1991 6   - Yes  - Yes 0.70[0.30; 1.62]-- -NAJentink (Carbamazepine), 2010 1 Controls   - mixed indications  - mixed indications 4.54[0.18; 111.60]11,033 -NAHernández-Díaz (Carbamazepine), 2012 1 MatchedMatched 0.33[0.03; 3.78]411 -NABànhidy (Carbamazepine), 2011 1 All studiesAll studies 0.97[0.58; 1.64]364,6720%NATomson (Carbamazepine), 2018 Campbell (Carbamazepine) (Controls exposed to Lamotrigine, sick), 2014 Hernández-Díaz (Carbamazepine), 2012 Bànhidy (Carbamazepine), 2011 Jentink (Carbamazepine), 2010 D'Souza (Carbamazepine) (Controls unexposed, sick), 1991 Van der Pol (Carbamazepine) (Controls unexposed, sick), 1991 70.110.01.0

Publication bias and p-hacking diagnosis

funnel plot
0.0-5.05.02.5550.000Tomson (Carbamazepine), 2018Campbell (Carbamazepine) (Controls exposed to Lamotrigine, sick), 2014Hernández-Díaz (Carbamazepine), 2012Bànhidy (Carbamazepine), 2011Jentink (Carbamazepine), 2010D'Souza (Carbamazepine) (Controls unexposed, sick), 1991Van der Pol (Carbamazepine) (Controls unexposed, sick), 1991

Asymetry test p-value = 0.5332 (by Egger's regression)

slope=-0.3248 (0.5229); intercept=0.4952 (0.7404); t=0.6688; p=0.5332

p values plot
0.01.00.01.0

Sub-groups analysis using all included studies

excluded 6685, 6823

Sub-groupsTE95% CIn casesn exposedkI2ROB type of controls unexposed controls (disease free or unspecified)unexposed controls (disease free or unspecified) 2.07[0.25; 17.50]-1444%NAJentink (Carbamazepine), 2010 D'Souza (Carbamazepine) (Controls unexposed, disease free), 1991 Van der Pol (Carbamazepine) (Controls unexposed, disease free), 1991 3 unexposed, sick controlsunexposed, sick controls 0.76[0.12; 4.89]4250%NABànhidy (Carbamazepine), 2011 D'Souza (Carbamazepine) (Controls unexposed, sick), 1991 Van der Pol (Carbamazepine) (Controls unexposed, sick), 1991 3 exposed to other treatment, sick controlsexposed to other treatment, sick controls 1.34[0.48; 3.71]324,64739%NATomson (Carbamazepine), 2018 Campbell (Carbamazepine) (Controls exposed to Lamotrigine, sick), 2014 Hernández-Díaz (Carbamazepine), 2012 30.510.01.0