| Study | Exclusion reasons | Rmk | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Li, 2020 | inadequate or absent control group | EXCLUDED: Comparison of exenatide with metformin whose safety was not established => No adequate control group. | |
| Choi (GLP-1RA), 2025 | inadequate or absent control group | EXCLUDED: Non-exposure definition included pregnancies exposed to non-insulin antidiabetic medications (ADMs), including SGLT2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), DPP4 inhibitors (DPP4i), and sulfonylureas (SU) whose safety was not established. |
Choi, E.-Y. Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf. 2025; 34:2405-. 10.1002/pds.70186 |
| Imbroane, 2025 | not in pregnancy | EXCLUDED: Exposure definition: 'Individuals who received a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist prescription within the 2 years preceding pregnancy.' => No exposure during pregnancy. |
Imbroane Am J Obstet Gynecol 2025; 233:116.e1-116.e7 10.1016/j.ajog.2025.01.019 |
| Parker, 2025 | not relevant study design | EXCLUDED: Pharmacovigilance data (rather case-series–type data than epidemiological data). |
Parker Diabetes Obes Metab 2025; 27:4102-4108 10.1111/dom.16437 |
| Su, 2025 | not relevant study design | EXCLUDED: A Mendelian Randomization Study. |
Su Diabetes Metab J 2025; 49:1242-1251 10.4093/dmj.2024.0521 |
| Westergaard - Liraglutide, 2025 | same data already obtained by other studies | EXCLUDED: Overlapping between Westergaard 2025 (2009 - 2023) and Kolding 2025 (2016 - 2023) => Kolding was preferred due to more relevant period of exposure (1st trimester versus 3 months or more before pregnancy or 1st trimester). |
Hviid, K. Hum. Reprod. 2024; 39:i23-. 10.1093/humrep/deae108.041 Westergaard, D. Hum. Reprod. 2025; 40:i28-. 10.1093/humrep/deaf097.046 |
| Choi, 2021 | Studies without separate analysis of the considered drug/class from other drugs/class | EXCLUDED: Analysis of anti-obesity drugs as a whole, without distinction between substances or class. |
Choi, E.J. Clin. Exp. Obstet. Gynecol. 2021; 48:514-. 10.31083/j.ceog.2021.03.2331 |