| Study | Exclusion reasons | Rmk | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yost, 2003 | inadequate or absent control group | EXCLUDED: Promethazine and metoclopramide were administrated in the 2 groups. No adequate control group. | |
| zNumazaki, 2000 | other reason | RETRACTATION. This article has been retracted at the request of the Editor-in-Chief, Dr. Robert R. Gaiser. The University of Toho, where Dr. Fujii was employed, determined that the integrity of the published data could not be verified or substantiated | |
| zFujii, 1998 | other reason | EXCLUDED: RETRACTATION. This article has been retracted at the request of the Editor-in-Chief. The University of Toho, where Dr. Fujii was employed, determined that the integrity of the published data could not be verified or substantiated | |
| zLacasse, 2009 | other reason | EXCLUDED: Results of neonate outcomes NOT exploitable (male to female sex ratio was significantly lower for the new HG protocol than in the control group (sex ratio: 0.41 vs. 1.03, respectively). No congenital malformations in the new HG protocol). |
zLacasse A Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2009;143:43-9 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2008.11.007 |
| zNumazaki, 2003 | other reason | RETRACTATION. This article has been retracted at the request of the Editor-in-Chief, Dr. Robert R. Gaiser. The University of Toho, where Dr. Fujii was employed, determined that the integrity of the published data could not be verified or substantiated. | |
| Hastoy, 2015 | not relevant study design | EXCLUDED: the study did not assessed the impact of the treatment but to the impact of hyperemesis gravidarum (HG) on pregnancy (treatment are described but not analysed). |
Hastoy A J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 2015;44:154-63 10.1016/j.jgyn.2013.12.003 |
| Vella, 1985 | not relevant outcome | EXCLUDED: Apgar scores reported as continuous variables. All babies were born alive, with no significant difference in Apgar scores between the groups. | |
| Abas, 2014 | not relevant outcome | EXCLUDED: safety outcomes only concerned adverse event in the mother, not related to pregnancy. |
Abas MN Obstet Gynecol 2014;123:1272-9 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000242 |
| zAgah, 2015 | not relevant outcome | EXCLUDED: no result related to adverse maternal outcomes in relation with pregnancy or to adverse fetal/neonatal outcomes. |
zAgah J Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2015;71:657-662 10.1007/s00228-015-1845-8 |
| zHabib, 2013 | not relevant outcome | EXCLUDED: no result related to adverse maternal outcomes in relation with pregnancy or to adverse fetal/neonatal outcomes. |
zHabib AS Obstet Gynecol 2013;121:615-23 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182839fee |
| zKlauser, 2011 | not relevant outcome | EXCLUDED: no result related to adverse maternal outcomes in relation with pregnancy or to adverse fetal/neonatal outcomes. |
zKlauser CK Am J Perinatol 2011;28:715-21 10.1055/s-0031-1280594 |
| zLi, 2012 | not relevant outcome | EXCLUDED: no result related to adverse maternal outcomes in relation with pregnancy or to adverse fetal/neonatal outcomes. | |
| zHabek, 2004 | not relevant outcome | EXCLUDED: no result related to adverse maternal outcomes in relation with pregnancy or to adverse fetal/neonatal outcomes. |
zHabek D Forsch Komplementarmed Klass Naturheilkd 2004;11:20-3 10.1159/000077192 |
| zGriffiths, 2012 | not relevant outcome | EXCLUDED: no result related to adverse maternal outcomes in relation with pregnancy or to adverse fetal/neonatal outcomes. |
zGriffiths JD Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;:CD007579 10.1002/14651858.CD007579.pub2 |
| zDanzer, 1997 | not relevant outcome | EXCLUDED: no result related to adverse maternal outcomes in relation with pregnancy or to adverse fetal/neonatal outcomes. | |
| zParanjothy, 2010 | not relevant outcome | EXCLUDED: no result related to adverse maternal outcomes in relation with pregnancy or to adverse fetal/neonatal outcomes. |
zParanjothy S Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;:CD004943 10.1002/14651858.CD004943.pub3 |
| zParanjothy, 2014 | not relevant outcome | EXCLUDED: no result related to adverse maternal outcomes in relation with pregnancy or to adverse fetal/neonatal outcomes. |
zParanjothy S Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;:CD004943 10.1002/14651858.CD004943.pub4 |
| zMishriky, 2012 | not relevant outcome | EXCLUDED: no result related to adverse maternal outcomes in relation with pregnancy or to adverse fetal/neonatal outcomes. | |
| zMcParlin, 2016 | not relevant outcome | EXCLUDED: no result related to adverse maternal outcomes in relation with pregnancy or to adverse fetal/neonatal outcomes. | |
| zMayhall, 2015 | not relevant outcome | EXCLUDED: no result related to adverse maternal outcomes in relation with pregnancy or to adverse fetal/neonatal outcomes. |
zMayhall EA Am J Emerg Med 2015;33:882-6 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.03.032 |
| zBondok, 2006 | not relevant outcome | EXCLUDED: no result related to adverse maternal outcomes in relation with pregnancy or to adverse fetal/neonatal outcomes. |
zBondok RS Crit Care Med 2006;34:2781-3 10.1097/01.CCM.0000242156.15757.70 |
| zRocke, 1994 | not relevant outcome | EXCLUDED: no result related to adverse maternal outcomes in relation with pregnancy or to adverse fetal/neonatal outcomes. | |
| zTan, 2009 | not relevant outcome | EXCLUDED: no result related to adverse maternal outcomes in relation with pregnancy or to adverse fetal/neonatal outcomes. |
zTan PC Gynecol Obstet Invest 2009;67:151-7 10.1159/000181182 |
| zMohammadbeigi, 2011 | not relevant outcome | EXCLUDED: no result related to adverse maternal outcomes in relation with pregnancy or to adverse fetal/neonatal outcomes. | |
| zTan, 2010 | not relevant outcome | EXCLUDED: no result related to adverse maternal outcomes in relation with pregnancy or to adverse fetal/neonatal outcomes. |
zTan PC Obstet Gynecol 2010;115:975-81 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181d99290 |
| zPan, 2001 | not relevant outcome | EXCLUDED: no result related to adverse maternal outcomes in relation with pregnancy or to adverse fetal/neonatal outcomes. | |
| zDriver, 1996 | not relevant outcome | EXCLUDED: no result related to adverse maternal outcomes in relation with pregnancy or to adverse fetal/neonatal outcomes. | |
| zStein, 1997 | not relevant outcome | EXCLUDED: no result related to adverse maternal outcomes in relation with pregnancy or to adverse fetal/neonatal outcomes. | |
| zHamilton, 2018 | not relevant outcome | EXCLUDED: no result related to adverse maternal outcomes in relation with pregnancy or to adverse fetal/neonatal outcomes. | |
| zO'Sullivan, 1985 | not relevant outcome | EXCLUDED: no result related to adverse maternal outcomes in relation with pregnancy or to adverse fetal/neonatal outcomes. | |
| zMurphy, 1984 | not relevant outcome | EXCLUDED: no result related to adverse maternal outcomes in relation with pregnancy or to adverse fetal/neonatal outcomes. | |
| zKimura, 2011 | not relevant outcome | EXCLUDED: no result related to adverse maternal outcomes in relation with pregnancy or to adverse fetal/neonatal outcomes. | |
| zKashifard, 2013 | not relevant outcome | EXCLUDED: no exploitable result related to adverse maternal outcomes in relation with pregnancy or to adverse fetal/neonatal outcomes. | |
| Huseyinoglu, 2016 | not relevant outcome | EXCLUDED: no result related to adverse maternal outcomes in relation with pregnancy or to adverse fetal/neonatal outcomes. |
Huseyinoglu Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 2016; 66:252-. 10.1007/s13224-015-0679-8 |
| Berkovitch, 2000 | repeat population groups, duplicate reports (most recent study included) | EXCLUDED: study's results included in Berkovitch et al. 2002. |
Berkovitch M N Engl J Med 2000;343:445-6 10.1056/NEJM200008103430616 |
| zBifarini, 1992 | article unavailable | EXCLUDED: study on efficacy and not on safety (data not checked, article unavailable). | |
| zBraun, 1994 | article unavailable | EXCLUDED: study on efficacy and not on safety (data not checked, article unavailable). | |
| zMcGarry, 1973 | no specific data | EXCLUDED: no results. | |
| Benevent, 2019 | Studies without separate analysis of the considered drug/class from other drugs/class | EXCLUDED: Atropinic drugs analyzed as a whole without distinction between treatments. | |
| Ferreira, 2003 | Studies without separate analysis of the considered drug/class from other drugs/class | EXCLUDED: The group was intramuscular chlorpromazine, intravenous dimenhydrinate, intravenous metoclopramide, or a combination of doxylamine–pyridoxine, without distinction between treatments. |
Ferreira, E. Journal of Pharmacy Technology 2003; 19:349-. 10.1177/875512250301900602 |
| Banhidy, 2007 | Studies without separate analysis of the considered drug/class from other drugs/class | EXCLUDED: analysis according to illness status, without distinction between treatments. |
Banhidy Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2007; 134:157-63 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.08.025 |
| Lenoir, 2020 | Studies without separate analysis of the considered drug/class from other drugs/class | EXCLUDED: analysis according to exposure to medications as a whole, without distinction between treatments. |
Lenoir Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2020; 247:42-48 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.01.042 |
| zTan, 2018 | pattern of exposure | EXCLUDED: study on pattern of exposure, without fetal/maternal/neonate safety data. |
zTan A Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2018;58:278-290 10.1111/ajo.12714 |
| Das, 2016 | pattern of exposure | EXCLUDED: study on pattern of exposure, without fetal/maternal/neonate safety data. | |
| Fonseca, 2002 | pattern of exposure | EXCLUDED: data on pattern of exposure, without data on maternal/fetal/neonate safety outcomes. |
Fonseca Rev Saude Publica 2002; 36:205-12 10.1590/s0034-89102002000200013 |
| Olesen, 1999 | pattern of exposure | EXCLUDED: data on pattern of exposure, without data on maternal/fetal/neonate safety outcomes. |
Olesen Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999; 78:686-92 10.1034/j.1600-0412.1999.780805.x |
| Engeland, 2008 | pattern of exposure | EXCLUDED: study on pattern of exposure, without fetal/maternal/neonate safety data. |
Engeland Br J Clin Pharmacol 2008; 65:653-60 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2008.03102.x |