| Study | Type of data | Exposure measurement | Outcome assessment | Adjustment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andersen (vs diclofenac), 2016 | retrospective cohort (claims database) | niformation on drug use was acquired from the National Prescription Register (Register of Medicinal Product Statistics) | National Hospital Register was used to identify all records of induced abortion [O04, O05 and O06 according to the International Classification of Diseases 10th edition Danish revision (ICD10)] and all records of miscarriage (ICD10-codes O021 and O03) | maternal age (five categories: 20, 20–24, 25–29, 30–34, C35 years), household income (as quartiles), educational length in months (four categories: B143, 144–155, 156–179, C180 months), number of previous miscarriages (four categories: 0, 1, 2, C3) and year of outcome (three categories: 1997–2001, 2002–2006, 2007–2010). |
| Andersen (vs unexposed), 2016 | retrospective cohort (claims database) | niformation on drug use was acquired from the National Prescription Register (Register of Medicinal Product Statistics) | National Hospital Register was used to identify all records of induced abortion [O04, O05 and O06 according to the International Classification of Diseases 10th edition Danish revision (ICD10)] and all records of miscarriage (ICD10-codes O021 and O03) | maternal age (five categories: 20, 20–24, 25–29, 30–34, C35 years), household income (as quartiles), educational length in months (four categories: B143, 144–155, 156–179, C180 months), number of previous miscarriages (four categories: 0, 1, 2, C3) and year of outcome (three categories: 1997–2001, 2002–2006, 2007–2010). |
| Auffret, 2016 | prospective cohort | Pregnant women who had contacted a pharmacovigilance centre (CRPV) between 1 January 1988 and 31 December 2012. Inclusion criteria: 1) exposure to misoprostol before 13WG 2) first contact with the CRPV before 22 weeks of gestation (WG) 3) known pregnancy outcome and examinable newborn or fetus. | mothers' report confirmed by physician | |
| Barbero, 2011 | prospective cohort | Interview of mothers during consultation in LSF | Mother's report confirmed by physician in case of malformation | age, niveau de scolarité, activité professionnelle |
| Brasil, 2000 | case control | Standard maternal report | Standard maternal report | maternal age, birth weight |
| Dal Pizzol, 2008 | retrospective cohort | Maternal interview. The specific use of products to induce menstruationwas investigated with the question: “To discoverwhether you were pregnant, did you use some kindof drug for your period to come?”. | Mother’s medical chart. Congenital anomalies were classified according to the 9th Revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9) | yes but factors were not clearly explained |
| Opaleye, 2010 | case control | Maternal interviews by a trained team by means of a structured questionnaire based on the Latin American Collaborative Study of Congenital Malformations | The search for newborns who met the criteria for inclusion of the sample was given through daily phone calls to each of the hospitals. | no specified |
| Orioli, 2000 | case control | mother's interwiew by a qualified paediatrician in the puerperium. | not specified | not specified |
| Pastuszak, 1998 | case control | misoprostol treatment (indication, route, dose, duration, and complications) was extracted from the records by personnel using a standardized form | clinical geneticists | |
| Vargas, 2000 | case control | Structured maternal questionnaire. Possible pregnancy termination attempts and misoprostol use were interrogated by open, semi-open, or closed questions. | Not specified | Matching according to maternal age (± 2 year) and parity |
| Vauzelle, 2013 | prospective cohort | Health care professionales are asked to answer standardized questions referring to specific exposure | a month after he estimated date of birth |